Series of questions – some of which may have some complicated legal ideas attached. When you start the process of creating your Legal Zoom will, the online platform will run you through a So let’s talk about those circumstances and some of the upsides and downsides to a Legal Zoom will. But, for the wrong people or the wrong circumstances, a Legal Zoom will can be invalid, unwieldy, inappropriate, or For a certain set of customers, Legal Zoom has really done a great thing making legal services more accessible. Using Legal Zoom for creating a will is a great option for the right people under the right circumstances. Tell you how terrible their documents are and have all kinds of horror stories for you. There are some attorneys out there who will tell you to NEVER use Legal Zoom for anything. While Legal Zoom can be a convenient and affordable option for some people, it Of the most common questions that I get has to do with the comparison of a Legal Zoom will to anĪttorney-prepared will. Legal Zoom is a popular online platform that provides legal services, including the creation of wills. Read more about the Aldrich case at, or read the opinion at. An investment in estate planning documents drafted and reviewed by Maine lawyers during your life can save your beneficiaries thousands of dollars in attorneys’ fees after your death. Rudman Winchell’s E-State Planning service can provide you with the efficiency and economy of commercial forms, while also providing the peace of mind that comes with the legal advice of a Maine attorney that your testamentary intent will be properly reflected in your estate planning documents. In this case, a similar result would occur under Maine intestacy laws. The court held that a note granting all her property to her surviving brother, which was hand written by the testator after execution of her will, was not relevant as it did not meet execution requirements of the Florida Probate Code.įlorida Justice Pariente, in her concurring opinion, stated that the case reminded her of the old adage, “penny-wise and pound-foolish,” in that Aldrich had used a commercially accessible form apparently without legal advice, which determined the unintended result. The Florida Supreme Court ruled in favor of the nieces. The surviving brother claimed that the intent of the testator was that the entire estate should pass to him. Two of Aldrich’s nieces, the children of another previously deceased brother, asserted an interest in the estate, claiming that all property not specifically devised should pass to them by the laws of intestacy.
Aldrich’s sister predeceased her, and her brother was appointed as personal representative of the estate. The form did not include a residuary clause, which provides for distribution of property not specifically listed in the will.Īldrich had specifically devised the primary assets of her estate to her sister, and to her brother if the sister did not survive her. Basile (SC11-2147), the testator Ann Aldrich used an E-Z Legal form to devise certain items she had listed on the form. The Florida Supreme Court recently ruled for two nieces not included in a will drawn up by a testator on an “E-Z Legal Form.” In Aldrich v. Alternative Dispute Resolution – Mediation.Special Needs Trusts & Supplemental Needs Trusts.
Estate Planning & Elder Law – Resources.18th Annual Employment Law Seminar Resources.19th Annual Employment Law Seminar Resources.OUI (Operating Under the Influence a/k/a DUI or DWI).Family Owned Businesses/Succession Planning.
0 kommentar(er)
